Treated Like a Dog?
You may remember the surprising news that the late Leona Helmsley left a $12 million bequest in her will for her Maltese dog named Trouble. With the large bequest, Helmsley’s will provided that Trouble would continue to enjoy the same opulent life even after Helmsley’s passing. In addition to the money, Helmsely’s will also provided that Trouble would be buried next to Helmsley in the family mausoleum. Helmsely’s will also set aside an additional $3 million for cleaning and maintenance of the mausoleum. With the $12 million gift, Trouble was apparently the recipient of one of the largest single individual trusts from Helmsley’s fortune, estimated to be worth $4 billion.
Now it appears that poor Trouble will not receive the entire gift and have to survive on a mere $2 million. Helmsley’s grandchildren alleged that Helmsley was not mentally competent when she signed the 2005 will which left the large bequest to Trouble. According to this article in the New York Post, a Manhattan judge approved an agreement to reduce Trouble’s inheritance from $12 million to $2 million. Under the new deal, $10 million of Trouble’s bequest will go to Helmsley’s large charitable foundation.
It seems only appropriate that Leona Helmsley, dubbed by some as the “Queen of Mean” would have an equally controversial animal. According to a former housekeeper, Trouble slept in Helmsley’s bed and was fed chef-prepared meals in porcelain bowls and silver trays. This same housekeeper actually sued Helmsley for nerve damage she allegedly suffered after being repeatedly bitten by the animal. Trouble’s care taker estimated Trouble’s annual expenses at $190,000 including an estimated $100,000 for the dog’s security squad (which was apparently warranted because of the alleged death threats against Trouble). Given that Trouble is already nine years old, Trouble’s trustees did not oppose the settlement, apparently believing $2 million was adequate for Trouble’s care.
Now it appears that poor Trouble will not receive the entire gift and have to survive on a mere $2 million. Helmsley’s grandchildren alleged that Helmsley was not mentally competent when she signed the 2005 will which left the large bequest to Trouble. According to this article in the New York Post, a Manhattan judge approved an agreement to reduce Trouble’s inheritance from $12 million to $2 million. Under the new deal, $10 million of Trouble’s bequest will go to Helmsley’s large charitable foundation.
It seems only appropriate that Leona Helmsley, dubbed by some as the “Queen of Mean” would have an equally controversial animal. According to a former housekeeper, Trouble slept in Helmsley’s bed and was fed chef-prepared meals in porcelain bowls and silver trays. This same housekeeper actually sued Helmsley for nerve damage she allegedly suffered after being repeatedly bitten by the animal. Trouble’s care taker estimated Trouble’s annual expenses at $190,000 including an estimated $100,000 for the dog’s security squad (which was apparently warranted because of the alleged death threats against Trouble). Given that Trouble is already nine years old, Trouble’s trustees did not oppose the settlement, apparently believing $2 million was adequate for Trouble’s care.
June 15th is Elder Abuse Awareness Day!
Although elder abuse was first recognized in the 1970s as a problem in the United States, it is disappointing to see that it is still not a well-know public health issue, especially considering the magnitude of the problem. According to this report prepared for Congress, during 1996 there were 500,000 incidents of elder abuse in the United States. However, this same report asserts that elder abuse claims were vastly underreported, with only 16% of the incidents being reported to law enforcement agencies during the same time period. According to one AARP advisor "people over age 60 make up only one-eighth of the U.S. population, yet they constitute one of every three scam victims."
In an effort to revise this worldwide attitude, in 2006 the United Nations declared June 15th to be World Elder Abuse Awareness day. The International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse has suggested wearing purple as a sign of support to prevent the problem of elder abuse. In Los Angeles, celebrities including Ed Asner, Art Linkletter, Michael Reagan, Los Angeles Police Department Police Chief William Bratton, have contributed to the film Saving our Parents which was released in April 2008.
Elder abuse is generally considered to include any knowing intentional or negligent act that results in harm to a vulnerable adult. Such harm can include but is not limited to emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, exploitation, neglect or abandonment. Elder abuse is frequently attributed to care givers but in my estimation it is often more common within families. I have encountered numerous situations where family members attempt to misappropriate a senior’s assets for their own benefit in disregard for the senior who is no longer able to raise an adequate defense.
Another commonly recognized form of elder abuse is known as self-abuse. The typical self-abuse situation involves a senior who is no longer capable of managing his or her daily needs and, without involved family or support, the senior tolerates living in dangerous conditions. In the course of my practice, I have encountered numerous elderly individuals living in squalor simply because they were no longer able to understand their conditions or manage their affairs. Sometimes the senior’s deficiencies are physical (failing eyesight, lack of mobility), sometimes the limitations are mental (dementia, Alzheimer’s disease) and sometimes the deficiencies causing self-neglect are manifold.
So what can you do to help prevent elder abuse? I am a big fan of old fashion values: stay close to your loved ones, friends or neighbors who may vulnerable. It is always a good idea to be wary of any new person or organization who becomes involved in an elder’s life. Ask questions and speak up if you have concerns. If the concerns appear serious, call your local law enforcement agency. In Los Angeles County, we are also lucky enough to have a 24 hour Elder Abuse Hotline, (telephone (877) 4-R-SENIORS), which allows you to make confidential reports of suspected elder abuse. If the situation is not resolved to your satisfaction, it may also be useful to consider legal assistance including possibly a conservatorship for the senior in need.
In an effort to revise this worldwide attitude, in 2006 the United Nations declared June 15th to be World Elder Abuse Awareness day. The International Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse has suggested wearing purple as a sign of support to prevent the problem of elder abuse. In Los Angeles, celebrities including Ed Asner, Art Linkletter, Michael Reagan, Los Angeles Police Department Police Chief William Bratton, have contributed to the film Saving our Parents which was released in April 2008.
Elder abuse is generally considered to include any knowing intentional or negligent act that results in harm to a vulnerable adult. Such harm can include but is not limited to emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, exploitation, neglect or abandonment. Elder abuse is frequently attributed to care givers but in my estimation it is often more common within families. I have encountered numerous situations where family members attempt to misappropriate a senior’s assets for their own benefit in disregard for the senior who is no longer able to raise an adequate defense.
Another commonly recognized form of elder abuse is known as self-abuse. The typical self-abuse situation involves a senior who is no longer capable of managing his or her daily needs and, without involved family or support, the senior tolerates living in dangerous conditions. In the course of my practice, I have encountered numerous elderly individuals living in squalor simply because they were no longer able to understand their conditions or manage their affairs. Sometimes the senior’s deficiencies are physical (failing eyesight, lack of mobility), sometimes the limitations are mental (dementia, Alzheimer’s disease) and sometimes the deficiencies causing self-neglect are manifold.
So what can you do to help prevent elder abuse? I am a big fan of old fashion values: stay close to your loved ones, friends or neighbors who may vulnerable. It is always a good idea to be wary of any new person or organization who becomes involved in an elder’s life. Ask questions and speak up if you have concerns. If the concerns appear serious, call your local law enforcement agency. In Los Angeles County, we are also lucky enough to have a 24 hour Elder Abuse Hotline, (telephone (877) 4-R-SENIORS), which allows you to make confidential reports of suspected elder abuse. If the situation is not resolved to your satisfaction, it may also be useful to consider legal assistance including possibly a conservatorship for the senior in need.
Can I Avoid Probate by Placing My Child on Title to my Assets?
In California, there are some very good reasons for avoiding the probate administration process. My three favorite reasons include (i) the cost; (ii) the time involved; and (iii) the public nature of the proceedings. For most estates, probate administration costs generally run from four to eight percent of the gross value of the estate and frequently take at least eight months to complete. To avoid these problems, some individuals engaged in what I affectionately refer to as ‘backyard’ estate planning. With respect to many assets, this involves using joint tenancy, which avoids the probate administration system (you can find a list of other probate avoidance devices here). Often I am asked whether this is a reasonable solution to avoid probate but avoid the cost of preparing an estate plan. In most circumstances, my answer to the question is a resounding “no”.
Under California law, joint tenancy includes what is referred to as the “right of survivorship” which means that when one tenant passes away, the asset transfers to the surviving tenant by operation of law. With a bank account, a surviving tenant can present a death certificate to the financial institution and remove the surviving tenant from the joint tenancy account. With real estate, the surviving tenant executes a form known as an affidavit of death of joint tenant which then places title solely in the name of the survivor. While these devices can work well with domestic partners or married couples (who are also bound by family law), they often fail when used with other parties such as children. In fact, using joint tenancy in these situations often creates more problems than it solves.
With respect to financial accounts, the decision to place another person on the account as a joint tenant grants an ownership interest in the entire account to the new joint tenant. The most obvious risk is that the new joint tenant has ownership over the entire account, and can clean it out almost immediately. While the original owner would have a legal claim against the new joint tenant under these circumstances, often you have to sue the joint tenant and find the missing assets before they will be returned (which is frequently challenging if not impossible in many cases). With respect to real estate, making such a transfer, unless accompanied by separate agreement, is frequently considered an irrevocable transfer. What this means is that if the original owner changes his or her mind about disposition, or wants to sell or refinance the property, the original owner will not be able to do so without the consent of the new tenant.
Continue Reading...
Under California law, joint tenancy includes what is referred to as the “right of survivorship” which means that when one tenant passes away, the asset transfers to the surviving tenant by operation of law. With a bank account, a surviving tenant can present a death certificate to the financial institution and remove the surviving tenant from the joint tenancy account. With real estate, the surviving tenant executes a form known as an affidavit of death of joint tenant which then places title solely in the name of the survivor. While these devices can work well with domestic partners or married couples (who are also bound by family law), they often fail when used with other parties such as children. In fact, using joint tenancy in these situations often creates more problems than it solves.
With respect to financial accounts, the decision to place another person on the account as a joint tenant grants an ownership interest in the entire account to the new joint tenant. The most obvious risk is that the new joint tenant has ownership over the entire account, and can clean it out almost immediately. While the original owner would have a legal claim against the new joint tenant under these circumstances, often you have to sue the joint tenant and find the missing assets before they will be returned (which is frequently challenging if not impossible in many cases). With respect to real estate, making such a transfer, unless accompanied by separate agreement, is frequently considered an irrevocable transfer. What this means is that if the original owner changes his or her mind about disposition, or wants to sell or refinance the property, the original owner will not be able to do so without the consent of the new tenant.
Continue Reading...
